Times Techie Envisions the Future of News | Epicenter from Wired.com.
We all need to think like Nick and truely envision what needs to be done next. Then go and do it. Newspapers ahve to think differently.
Times Techie Envisions the Future of News | Epicenter from Wired.com.
We all need to think like Nick and truely envision what needs to be done next. Then go and do it. Newspapers ahve to think differently.
Printing The NYT Costs Twice As Much As Sending Every Subscriber A Free Kindle.
Hmmmmm. Funny it seems we arehaving a meeting about the kindle at work next week.
Erick Schonfeld at TechCrunch posted “The New York Times Clutters Up Its Homepage With Links From Elsewhere (In Beta)” today – makes a good point.
The concept here is that if readers can find the best news and opinion from around the Web right from the homepage, they will keep coming back to it as a starting point, just like they do with Digg or Techmeme. Where this breaks down is that the reason I still have the New York Times as my homepage is that I want to see at a glance what is going on in the world…I don’t need three more headlines on the same story. That clutters the page, and leaves less room for other headlines. I want that page to maximize the number of different stories I can explore about different subjects, not different points of view on the same subject.
I think Erick is giving the NYT an “A” for effort – but NYT is failing to see the point. The links others is great – but we don’t need another Google News – we have a Google News.
When I first read this article I thought he was critizing – but after further review, Erick is right on!
Image by Saffanna via Flickr I read this post from the “The Herald Tribune” the “Global Edition of the New York Times”, the post was titled “Microsoft leveraging Silverlight and riling critics” and it really about made me puke.
The were criticizing Microsoft for the closed solution:
But there’s a catch. To view the video, it will be necessary to download a Microsoft Web browser software component based on a new proprietary technology, Silverlight, that is intended to make it possible to display interactive animations, graphics, audio and video, all within a fixed window inside a Web browser display.
But in the next flippin’ paragraph they say this:
Silverlight will work for both Macintosh and Windows PC users, and a version for Linux is also available. A mobile version will be available on Windows Mobile and Nokia smartphones.
Excuse me – what makes that differnet from Flash or Quicktime? Ummm…nothing. Well really – it is different because I’m not sure they support all those formats.
The post then goes on to say that it doesn’t allow enough room for innovation:
“They’re still playing the same games,” said Michael Nelson, professor of Internet studies at Georgetown University. “It’s a way to lock up the content, and it’s not enabling as much innovation as we would like to see.”
Have they seen what this thing can do? What NBC and Microsoft has done with the Olympic video is just wicked cool. I’m spent about 2.5 hours using it last night and I was so happy. Instead of watching gymnastics like the other NBC viewers – I watch Judo, Archery and Greco Roman Wrestling – LIVE.
Yes LIVE. It was awesome. The only thing missing was commentary – but it was so great. Super quality – and I do not have a very fast internet connection. I was amazed.
All I say – kudos to NBC for letting go of the control and allowing people to see what they want, when they want it. (For the most part – it seems there may be a little issue with the simulcast of TV/Internet) Microsoft – for leveraging the Silverlight platform to show some new cool video applications and The New York Times – for not getting it…at all.