Posts Tagged ‘television’

Give a Presentation or have a Discussion?

As I prepare for a couple of internal presentations I’m giving at work I stumbled across this post from Fred Wilson called “Presentations vs Discussions

A presentation is like a TV show. It’s a lean back experience. A discussion is like an online chat room. It is a lean forward experience. They are not the same thing and in many cases they work against each other.

Although I LOVE TV shows – I’m not wanted to be one.  I love discussions – the more heated and debate ridden the better.  I need to take a look at my preparation and see how I can turn what I was thinking into a discussion.

If you have any tips…please let me know.  I’ll post a reply to this post when I find some.

“Changing the paradigm away from a presentation” is the point of this post. Presentations are important. I do a lot of them and post all of them on this blog in advance. I am not saying they don’t have a role. But if you want to foster real engagement and real discussion, they are not helpful and in fact I think they are hurtful.

NOTE: Fred Wilson is a very cool guy who is a venture capitalist/president at Union Square Ventures and lives in New York.   Fred is a true spokesman for the entrepreneur, and a cool guy – do yourself a favor and check him out.

Enhanced by Zemanta

AT&T – big, bad and high tech

Image representing iPhone as depicted in Crunc...
Image via CrunchBase

After reading my CEO’s blog today – it made me think about my “call” with AT&T on Saturday.  I’ve recently signed up for an iPhone from AT&T.

Onto the story – I took a motorcycle ride on Saturday to meet a friend’s son for lunch.  When we arrived at the restaurant, I checked the and had two voice messages.  One was a friend and the other was AT&T.  I had not set-up my payments on my online billpay yet, so I had not made a payment.  I was basically behind.  Not intentionally – but I really just not gotten around to it.

So I called the 800 number and 2:31 (two minutes – thirty second later, I checked) I was done.  I had made a bank transfer of funds.  Now some will get a bit freaked out – but I’m saying thank you.

Firstly – you can take the iPhone when you pry it out of my cold dead hands.  The iPhone is awesome.  Seriously – 10x better than any other phone I’ve used.  Secondly – 2:31 seconds for me to pay my bill – COME ON!

Now – what does that have to do with newspapers and media?  Well – it goes back to what Chuck said in the blog post.

I do not believe that human nature is changing. However, we are learning new behaviors, using new tools.

Exactly.  I felt too busy to pay the phone bill.  I could have, but just chose not to.  But AT&T was cool with that and changed their behavior to adapt to my crappy ways.

So – what have we (as media companies) done to change what we do for people?  Do we even know who the people are?  What they do? What they want?  We have no clue what our people want or desire.

Just think what we could do if we knew the audience.  We have tens of sites, if we had all that data – plus the TV station, plus the newspaper and it was all available.  We could really know who they are and what they do and why they do what they do and that they may want you to let them pay the bill over a text message.

That would be good…but we don’t.  And we need to figure that out too.

Enhanced by Zemanta

DIY: Hide Your HDTV in Style

DIY: Hide Your HDTV in Style.

This is brilliant, I just need to build the fireplace first!

Enhanced by Zemanta

A TV-Connected Computer Makes Me More Productive. No, Really.

As some of you may be aware, when I’m not writing here, I’m writing for another blog on The GigaOM Network, TheAppleBlog. TAB’s focus, as you can probably guess, is Apple products and software. Some of my latest posts there have been about the new Mac Mini, which I recently purchased for use as an HTPC, connected full-time to my TV and stereo.

via WebWorkerDaily » Archive A TV-Connected Computer Makes Me More Productive. No, Really. «.

I love me some HTPC!

Enhanced by Zemanta

Why TV Lost

Why TV Lost.

About twenty years ago people noticed computers and TV were on a collision course and started to speculate about what they’d produce when they converged. We now know the answer: computers. It’s clear now that even by using the word “convergence” we were giving TV too much credit. This won’t be convergence so much as replacement. People may still watch things they call “TV shows,” but they’ll watch them mostly on computers.

Yup.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Rebuild a TV Station on the cheap

My ooVoo Day With... John Wall

Image by klessblog via Flickr

I’ve been having some hallway discussions with our CEO Chuck Peters (or as I affectionalty refer to him as “Chucky P”).  I think it started after I was talking too much about how cheap I thought I could rebuild a TV station.  I was tossing around a number which was close to 10% of the cost the consultants were estimating.

So this morning, Chucky P called me to the table about the conversation.  He’s asys – OK, mr. 90% reduction in cost…HOW?  It was a much nicer was that he asked – but seriously, he said – “tell me more – how would you do it?”

The Methodology
You first have to agree – it’s not going to be the “TV Station” it is today.  It’s a digital distribution station, a DDS.  This DDS will do many of the things a traditional station does, but it must look and adopt some of the best practices of the web.

It will be hard – and I know I don’t understand some of the TV concepts and I can hear the old school media guys saying – this is all good, but what about…   the point is to try and think about what TV will be in 3,4 and 7 years.  I’m not sure TV as we know it will exist in 7 years, so why rebuild it now to currect specs.

Slashdot ran a post Oct 05, 2006 called “Could I Run a TV Station on Linux?

  • I’m working with a low-power television station to update their playback system. Currently they’re using tape and I’ve been tasked to move them to computerized playback (MPEG-2, etc.) There are proprietary solutions (very expensive) and there are companies that bundle software with Windows and standard x86 hardware. Overall, they are generally unimpressive and won’t sell the software without bundling it with their own hardware. Tom’s Comment:  Wow does this sound familiar – this is exactly what I hear from my co-works at the tv station still today…but the interesting part is the other comments, I found some interesting one – but I’m sure I missed a couple of gems.
  • Actually, you can address a lot of those types of problems (like playlist management, etc.) with one of the many mplayer frontends on their related projects page [mplayerhq.hu]. All you need to do is choose whichever one you prefer and mplayer is your best friend for video playback.

  • The things you need are a scheduler (to determine which commercials air when), a program format spec file (to tell where in a program file the actual video begins and ends so you don’t end up unnecessarily airing several seconds of black as you might if you just paused the playback of a TV show), and a mechanism for crossfading the audio between spots to handle the case where people run it right up to the wire. You need a switcher for the video—the ability to quickly change from one foreground full-screen video window to another without any glitching. This is a lot harder than it sounds. Finally, you need a player that can start pretty much instantaneously and without glitch in the middle of a program. I haven’t found that to be true of VLC at all in my experience, but maybe it has improved a lot in the last few months….

  • For a possible controller UI, you might check out SongCue on SourceForge. I designed it for radio automation, but combine that UI with a preview pane above each controller and show a still frame from 5 seconds into a segment, and you have a UI that would work pretty well for what you’re doing, too. Maybe even show live video in the preview panes during playback. (I wouldn’t recommend the code from SongCue, though, as it’s pretty much raw Xlib, not for the faint of heart.)

  • If I were writing such a thing, I’d start with a Mac OS X (10.4 Server) box. Xsan provides a supported mechanism for handling your storage needs. QTKit can do your playback, and Quartz Composer should make switching the foreground full screen movie pretty easy. The only potential snag I can think of would be that if you aren’t careful, you could mouse over onto the live output signal, but all things considered, it’s probably the easiest way to build an app that does what you want, IMHO.

You see – this is a two year old post with ideas we have not seen people look at or try.  This is all good stuff.  I have not even begun to speak about user content – there are two projects like this going on – one for sure is based on Drupal…an open source contnet management system.  Don’t even get me started on my favorite CMS Wordpress – I’m SURE it could do it with one processor tied behind it’s back.

Here is also a pre-bult server from NetTVWorld (posted from CNet) which is calling it self a TV Station in a box and also – clains the idea of a reporter taking it with them to a story and broadcasting from there.  See link in comments to here.

Conclusion

So I’m not saying I can do it – but I think if you get a TV outsider who gets the web (someone like me) and a few TV people who really have a mindset to change the scene – it could be done…for 10% ok 20% of what they think!

Enhanced by Zemanta

J.J. Abrams and Fringe

Fringe (TV series)Image via Wikipedia

I have to say – I am a huge JJ Abrams fan.  Not the weird, dig through the trash kind, but really – really like his stuff kind.  I accidently ran acorss his new show Fringe this weekend and was totally blown away.  I mean, if you have ever been a fan of X-Files…then Fringe will be a great new show for you.

It will be interesting to see how the mainstream takes this new show and what kind of pub it will get.  It’s definitely “out there” and I’m sure some will be up in arms with it.

Enhanced by Zemanta

UK web ad spend 'to exceed TV in 2009'

From a guardian post from last week called “UK web ad spend ‘to exceed TV in 2009′” – it explains how in 2009 there will be more consumers of internet advertising that via TV.

The UK will become the first major economy to see advertisers spend more on the internet than on TV ads, according to the latest forecast from a leading media buying agency.

Then – as or possible more interesting:

The agency is also predicting that Sweden will this year become the first country to see advertisers spend more on the internet than on TV ads.

I think it goes to show that we, here in the US, don’t understand the whole internet advertising model.  I think sales departments still treat web ads as a chore we HAVE to do, rather than an opportunity we SHOULD be doing.

Companies really want to use internet ads and can effectivey leverage these ads to make money and build their business.

Twitter Delicious Facebook Stumbleupon