Posts Tagged ‘Website’

How fast is your site?

UNSPECIFIED - OCTOBER 10:  In this photo illus...
Image by Getty Images via Daylife

How fast is your site?

This is a very timely article, as today our network guy gave a me a call to warn me our website’s error log was out-of-control.  The caching plugin we were using was haywire.  I had to turn off the page level caching to slow the bleeding.  That increased our page load times and Tim said, and I quote, “this is getting so slow – page load times are almost 3 seconds.:

WHAT – 3 seconds.  Seriously – but he is right.  We need to get pages loading as fast as possible…and now.

Here is a tool for you:

We’ve just launched Site Performance, an experimental feature in Webmaster Tools that shows you information about the speed of your site and suggestions for making it faster.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Browsera Simultaneously Tests Your Site In Different Browsers

Checking sites in different browsers stinks.  Browsera is a tool which can make that a little less painful.

Browsera is an all-in-one, web-based tool for testing web sites for errors, complications, and layout issues. Unlike other similar tools, it does more than just take screenshots of various browsers; it provides an in-depth assessment of problematic areas in need of attention.

Browsera Simultaneously Tests Your Site In Different Browsers

Enhanced by Zemanta

Media WebDev 2.0

Rural Sign Post, Copper Center AK
Image by NNECAPA via Flickr

Life in the media is interesting.  There are so many things to do and a great sense of urgency.  And now I think it is time for WebDev to put on it’s “full court press“.

So, what is the big idea we can do that will change the game?  Results based development.  Now, I know the first thing you are going to say is “Isn’t WebDev a customer service driven department?”, and my response is – yes, kind of.

We do fulfill tasks ask of us by the different departments – but the one difference is, we are also the experts in the company, for now at least; at what works on the web, what is new and cool and are a fairly small and nimble team.  So we can’t do everything that is asked of us and all the things were asked to do are not the right thing to do.

So my thought is we break it up by revenue and traffic.  Now the numbers below may change, I’ll talk to the data team to get a better idea of what “successful” is – but that is easily changeable.  So here goes.

We will offer web sites in three tiers

  1. Tier one is  the concept stage, it will be a site which is very quick to market, will allow some options but for the most part – simple, lean and mean.  Oh, and we’ll guarantee this is up and ready in 1 business day.
  2. Tier two is the rising star stage, this is a site that has started to get noticed.  You’ll need a good bit of traffic a day, 5000-7000 visitors.  Content will need to be fresh and we’ll want to make sure there is buzz going on in this site’s niche.  At this point we’ll offer to customize the site a bit – iron out some kinks and offer around 15-20 hours of custom design and development.
  3. Tier three is big dog stage.  This site has made it – the site has traffic (12,000+ visitors a day),  the site has revenue ($10,000/month) and people are buzzing.  This site will get the full treatment – custom creative, working on custom API’s and integrated data and design.  This site will be used as a “best practice” for our company and the industry.

So that is what I’m thinking.  I told my boss I would work on a plan – so we’ll see what he thinks.  It will need to be refined – but I think it is a good model.  It allows WebDev to get some breathing room, it encourages our “customers” to get serious about a site (and content) before they send it to us and it encourages a more entrepreneurial attitude – something our whole company has been asked to do.  It also allows us to help niche sites get up and running in hours.

Please let me know if you think it will work!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

It's time to do "The Opposite"

It’s time to go Costanza!  Time to go Opposite.  Up is down and down is up!

[kaltura-widget wid="kx7fc7bbps" width="410" height="364" addpermission="0" editpermission="1" /]

It is time for a fresh set of rules, at least for a while.

Instead of creating a website which has so much stinking content – no one canfind a thing, maybe it’s time to show them NOTHING when they come.  Let’s just forgo the balcony and treat it like a new replationship relationship.

Step 1:   Be Nice.

Notice, we have not shown any news yet.  I told it this was different!

Notice, we have not shown any news yet. This is not the same old site - I told you it this was different!

Step 2:   Care.

Super – now you would ask them what they like:

This is a very hard part, sincerity.

This is a very hard part, sincerity.

Step 3:   Permission.

Say what?  Yes,we’re going to ask nicely for permission.  And preferences too!

You have to ask - do not assume.

You have to ask - do not assume.

Step 4:   Give them good, solid content.

Also – no ads if they said no.  We have to make sure we build trust.

Cool -  huh?

Cool - huh?

See what I mean, we spend way too much think wondering what people want and not enouhg enough time asking them.  We have to shake things up, it is time to turn it around…time to bring out the Costanza.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Are Web Sites Obsolete Yet?

WebWorkerDaily » Archive Are Web Sites Obsolete Yet? «.

Hmmm?

I don’t really think web sites are obsolete. Clearly, blogs are fundamentally web sites, but they are more dynamic and have more interactive features.

Enhanced by Zemanta

10 Principles of UI Masters

Lego Digital Designer
Image via Wikipedia

I really love UI (User Interface).  Like my buddy Matt T says, “I’m not ’smart’ enough to do UI, but I know a good one when I see it.”

Breathtaking and useful designs happen because the UI has been worked on tirelessly. It takes a real UI Master to understand how to make a terrific user experience on a website.

That is so true – UI is hard, and great UI is even harder.  The post goes on to tell about 10 principcals which great UI people live by.

  1. Don’t Forget About the User – Jason Fried
    Tom: Sometimes we just cannot forget the site is not for “us”, its for the user.  We need to identify that user and make sure we have their interests in mind.
  2. Don’t Overlook Error Pages – Jakob Nielsen
    Tom: This may be one of the biggest mistakes people make – they get the site done, and then take a break…but they forget that the “old” site had pages too.  Where do those go now?   Are they still available?
  3. Always Set a Background Color – Jeffrey Zeldman
  4. Don’t Overdo Accessibility Features – Roger Johansson
  5. Use Epicenter Design – Jason Fried
  6. Watch Your Users – Collis Ta’eed
    Tom: If you have never been humbled by this exercise – you need to be.  It will spin your head.
  7. Give Incentives For Users to Complete Forms – Jim Kukral
  8. Keep the UI Consistent – Jakob Nielsen
    Tom: My first reaction to this is “duh” – but its a good point.
  9. Keep Jargon to a Minimum – Erin Kissane
  10. Make a Prototype Instead of a Wireframe – David Verba

This stuff is lightsout cool.  And when it is “on”, it really can make a site sing.  If you have examples of good design, please post it to the comments.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Textures are hot

KColorEdit
Image via Wikipedia

This is a great post about textures in web design.  Hey – most people’s bandwidth is up, let’s make things look nice.

If you look around at well-designed websites in CSS galleries or any other source of design inspiration, you’ll see that texture is extremely common in modern Web design. One of the reasons it’s so popular is because of its versatility. Textures can be used in countless different ways and in a wide variety of design styles. As you look around, you’ll see how textures can be used in so many different ways by Web designers.

This gives me flashbacks of 1998 when every design the “creative team” gave us had gradiants and multi-colored background.  We’d smile, tell them how cool it was and then undo-it when we got back to the bat cave.

They would question it when they’d look at the finished product – but we would just tell them it was just the crappy PC screen…it would look much cooler when they got back up stairs to thir mac!  :)

Enhanced by Zemanta

HDYT – High Def You Tube?

High-Def Tubes

High-Def Tubes

I read the headlines too, and yawned just like you did.  But I took it one step further…I clicked.

Dude, it looks good! It really does.  Not sure if you can see it here – but this looks good, at regular scale and also at Full Screen.

Yes – it looks good when you click the window in the window.

This was all spurred when I read blogmaverick’s post called “Youtube’s Desperation

Where does that leave Youtube ? Actually in a far better place. Two websites. One of which becomes a video search engine , with out any advertising, that hosts purely amateur video. The other becomes a Hulu on steroids. A destination site that becomes a real media site. It becomes the ultimate content DVR where users can expect to find professionally created content along side the amateur videos that Youtube thought enough of to license.

So who knows – but it looks GOOD.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Twitter Delicious Facebook Stumbleupon